Henry Winkler: The Fonz for a New Generation
Annual Benefit Gala
FBVisit

Strategies to Help Students with LD in Science Classes

January 30th, 2012

As the national education agenda focuses greater attention on the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), many students with learning disabilities are finding it difficult to meet curriculum expectations. Students with language deficits are often challenged by the technical writing in textbooks, as well as the vocabulary and instructions given to carry out related activities.

In a study recently published in Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, researchers from George Mason University analyzed a number of studies that examined strategies to overcome the challenges students with language-learning deficits (dyslexia) face in the science classroom. The team found  the following strategies to be the most effective:

  • Verbal learning of declarative information: Keyword mnemonics (patterns of letters or other devices to assist memory) can be used to promote quick acquisition and persistent recall of vocabulary and fact-based content
  • Processing information in texts: Students taught to evaluate the structure of writing in textbooks (e.g., list, order, main idea, etc.), along with graphic organization strategies (e.g., embedding framed outlines and illustrations in text) help with remembering information
  • Activities-based instruction/experiential learning: learning by doing (e.g., experimenting with electro-magnetic fields) results in improved understanding and proficiency
  • Scientific thinking and reasoning: To help students with inductive reasoning (generalizing from immediate experience), it’s helpful for instructors to explicitly coach students through the thought process, increasing prompts until students draw correct conclusions
  • Differentiated instruction: Working with peer tutors in small groups or one-on-one and providing additional practice and support with content and concepts benefits all students, including those with LD


To learn more see Science Education and Students with Learning Disabilities



Rethinking Social Media For Your Child with LD

January 30th, 2012

As parents, we’ve become acutely aware of the downside of social media. Even if we’re not technologically savvy, we see the horror stories of cyberbullying, sexting, and pedophiles preying on innocent adolescents. In fact, much of the early research into social media has focused on the scary aspects that have made us all a lot smarter, and presumably better equipped to manage our children’s online behaviors.

However, don’t be too quick to throw out the baby with the bathwater.  Writing in The New York Times, Dr. Perri Klass recently reminded us that social media is neither negative nor positive—it’s how it’s used that matters. In Seeing Social Media More as A Portal Than as A Pitfall, Klass suggests that social media and the Internet are simply different environments in which children today are coming of age:

Our children are using social media to accomplish the eternal goals of adolescent development, which include socializing with peers, investigating the world, trying on identities and establishing independence.

In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media issued a clinical report, “The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents and Families.” It began by emphasizing the benefits of social media for children and adolescents, including enhanced communication skills and opportunities for social connections.

“A large part of this generation’s social and emotional development is occurring while on the Internet and on cellphones,” the report noted.

Our job as parents is to help them manage all this wisely, to understand—and avoid—some of the special dangers and consequences of making mistakes in these media. (We can expect the same kind of gratitude that we get for all of our guidance: mixed, of course, with an extra helping of contempt if our technical skills are not up to theirs.)

“Rather than taking a one-size-fits-all harm model, one of the questions parents need to ask is, ‘How is this going to interact with my child’s personality?’ ” said Clay Shirky, who teaches about social media at New York University. “Digital media is an amplifier. It tends to make extroverts more extroverted and introverts more introverted.”

And both parents and researchers need to be sure they understand the subtleties of the ways teenagers interpret social media.

At a 2011 symposium on the Internet and society, two researchers presented information on how teenagers understand negative talk on the Internet. What adults interpret as bullying is often read by teenagers as “drama,” a related but distinct phenomenon.

By understanding how teenagers think about harsh rhetoric, the researchers suggested, we may find ways to help them defend themselves against the real dangers of online aggression.

The problems of cyberbullying and Internet overuse are serious, and the risks of making mistakes online are very real. But even those who treat adolescents with these problems are now committed to the idea that there are other important perspectives for researchers—or parents, or teachers—looking at the brave new universe in which adolescence is taking place.

Social media, said Dr. Rich, “are the new landscape, the new environment in which kids are sorting through the process of becoming autonomous adults—the same things that have been going on since the earth cooled.”

 

Safety Zone

For children with LD and ADHD, who may have challenges when it comes to making and keeping friends, social media may be a way of connecting with others, exploring concerns in a safe and anonymous zone, and practicing friend-making skills.


Join the Conversation

Let us know ways in which social media has benefited your child with LD or ADHD. Share your thoughts below

Children with Learning Disabilities Are Often Exceptional

January 28th, 2012

It’s not too late to nominate an outstanding student with learning disabilities or ADHD for the Smart Kids with Learning Disabilities Youth Achievement Award. The $1,000 award recognizes the strengths and accomplishments of young people with LD and ADHD.

Previous winners of this award have proven their excellence in community service, art, music, science, and athletics. Any student 19 or younger with documented LD or ADHD who has demonstrated initiative, talent, and determination resulting in a notable accomplishment in any field is eligible. Honorable Mentions will also be awarded.

All applications must be postmarked by February 28, 2012. The winner will be presented with the award at Smart Kids’ annual benefit on Friday, June 8, 2012 in Norwalk, CT. Transportation and hotel accommodations will be provided for the winning student and his or her parents.

Download the Smart Kids Youth Achievement Award application at www.SmartKidswithLD.org and nominate your smart kid today!

Environmental Risk Factors for LD Uncovered

January 23rd, 2012


The findings from two unrelated research studies support a growing body of evidence that suggests some risk factors for learning disabilities and ADHD are environmental, and therefore potentially preventable. In one study, gestational diabetes was associated with higher incidence of ADHD, and in another study secondhand smoke was linked to ADHD and LD.


Gestational Diabetes

In the gestational diabetes study, reported in the most recent issue of Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, children born to women who developed diabetes during their pregnancy, and/or lived in low-income households, were at greater risk for subsequently being diagnosed with ADHD.

As a result of growing obesity rates, the number of women who experience gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, or diabetes during pregnancy,) has increased steadily over the past 20 years, especially among low-income individuals. In an effort to understand the impact on children, a research team led by Yoko Nomura, MD, Ph.D of Queens College surveyed parents of children born to mothers with and without GDM.

The team found that children born to GDM mothers from low-income households were 14 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than other children. As the researchers concluded:

This study demonstrates that children of mothers with GDM raised in lower SES [socioeconomic status] households are at far greater risk for developing ADHD and showing signs of suboptimal neurocognitive and behavioral development. Since ADHD is a disorder with high heritability, efforts to prevent exposure to environmental risks through patient education may help to reduce the nongenetic modifiable risk for ADHD and other developmental problems.


Secondhand Smoke

Medical News Today (MNT) recently reported the results of another study that found, “Children exposed to secondhand smoke in the home appear to be at 50% higher risk of neurobehavioural disorders such as ADHD/ADD and learning disabilities compared to unexposed children…”

In this study, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health analyzed survey data of more than 55,000 American children under age 12. The findings, as summarized by MNT include:

  • 6% of these children under 12 were exposed to secondhand smoke in the home: this corresponds to 4.8 million across the whole of the US.
  • The weighted prevalence of learning disabilities among these children was 8.2%.
  • For ADHD/ADD the prevalence was 5.9%  and for behavioral and conduct disorders this was 3.6%. Children exposed to secondhand smoke at home had a 50% higher chance of having two or more childhood behavioral disorders compared with unexposed children.
  • Boys appeared to be at significantly higher risk than girls.
  • Older children, especially aged between 9 and 11, and those in the poorest households had the highest risk.
  • Expressed in absolute terms (that is looking at the equivalent across the whole of the US), if children had not been exposed to secondhand smoke in the home, and if the relationship between such exposure and risk were to be causal, then these figures would show it may be possible to prevent 274,000 children from developing neurobehavioral disorders.

Both studies suggest the important role that modifiable environmental factors (factors that can be changed) play in the development of LD and ADHD, pointing to possible prevention pathways.

Make Time To Read

January 16th, 2012

January is a time of renewal—the perfect time to establish, or reestablish, the reading habit. If your child has learning disabilities and struggles with the written word, don’t assume he doesn’t like books. In fact, a good story can compel a reluctant reader to stick with reading even when the going gets tough.

With that in mind, we encourage you to set aside a time for reading with your child each day. And by reading we mean anything your child enjoys that involves the written word: comic books, magazines, electronic books, audio books, and of course traditional books.

Whether you read to her, she reads to you, or you read silently side by side, the act of consistently interacting with words and stories will help develop important literacy skills, provide valuable learning opportunities, and encourage an appreciation for reading that may last a lifetime.


Where to Begin

For some titles that are likely to spur your child’s love of literature, check out the lists of books for all ages, suggested by our experts:

Families Left Scrambling To Fill ADHD Prescriptions

January 10th, 2012

If you’ve been having trouble filling a prescription for ADHD medication, you’re not alone. The New York Times recently reported that hundreds of patients have flooded the Food and Drug Administration with complaints about pharmacies that do not have enough pills to fill their prescriptions.

The problem stems from a conflict between pharmaceutical companies that are trying to maximize profits and the Drug Enforcement Administration that is working to minimize the recreational abuse of ADHD drugs, which have become popular among college students seeking to get high.

According to New York Times science reporter Gardner Harris, the situation is a classic case of finger-pointing, where both sides claim the other is at fault:

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration say the shortages are a result of overly strict quotas set by the Drug Enforcement Administration, which, for its part, questions whether there really are shortages or whether manufacturers are simply choosing to make more of the expensive pills than the generics, creating supply and demand imbalances.

The situation has made for a rare open disagreement between two federal agencies.

“We have reached out to the D.E.A. and told them that there are shortage issues,” said Valerie Jensen, associate director of the F.D.A.’s drug shortage program. “But the quota issues are outside of our area of responsibility.”

Still, Special Agent Gary Boggs of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Office of Diversion Control, said in an interview, “We believe there is plenty of supply.”

Some high-priced pills are indeed readily available, and D.E.A. officials said that so long as that is the case, they believe that A.D.H.D. drug supplies are adequate. Agent Boggs attributed any supply disruptions to decisions made by manufacturers.

Regardless of who’s to blame for the shortages, millions of children and adults who rely on the medications to manage ADHD are suffering the consequences. There are reports of people going to dozens of pharmacies and still coming away with less than their full prescription; others have been forced to move from their generic brand to the name-brand and paying a premium co-pay in the process.

At this point, the shortages show no signs of abating. When and how the situation will end is anyone’s guess.


Mixed Report on Teen Substance Use

January 9th, 2012

There was a glimmer of good news in the recently released report from Monitoring the Future (MTF), the survey of teen behavior conducted annually by University of Michigan researchers. Since 1975 the MTF Survey has been polling a national sample of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students about their attitudes, values, and usage patterns regarding alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs.

Although the report does not specify results for adolescents with learning issues, we do know that children with LD and ADHD are at greater risk than their peers for engaging in risky health behaviors, including the use of those substances.


Cigarette & Alcohol Use Is Down

With that in mind, the MTF results for teens in general are encouraging—at least with regard to tobacco and alcohol use. Cigarette smoking and drinking appear to be at an all-time low in MTF history, continuing long-term trends. According to the MTF press release:

The 2011 national survey results from the Monitoring the Future study show decreases in teen smoking in all three grades under study. The proportion saying that they smoked at all in the prior 30 days fell significantly for the three grades combined, from 12.8% in 2010 to 11.7% this year.

The gradual decline in alcohol use continued into 2011, when all grades showed a further drop in all measures of alcohol use—lifetime, annual, 30-day, daily, and 5+ drinks on one or more occasions during the prior two weeks. For the three grades combined, the one-year declines in 2011 were statistically significant on all of these measures.

That’s the good news. The bad news is the use of these substances—particularly alcohol—is still a significant problem: alcohol remains the drug of choice by far among adolescents, with nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of 12th graders reporting past-year use.


Marijuana Use is Up

Of great concern is that the use of marijuana continues to increase, with synthetic substances playing an important role:

Marijuana use among teens rose in 2011 for the fourth straight year—a sharp contrast to the considerable decline that had occurred in the preceding decade. Daily marijuana use is now at a 30-year peak level among high school seniors.

“Put another way, one in every fifteen high school seniors today is smoking pot on a daily or near daily basis,” says Lloyd Johnston, the principal investigator of the study, “And that’s the highest rate that we have seen over the past thirty years—since 1981.”

“Synthetic marijuana,” which until earlier this year was legally sold and goes by such names as “K2” and “spice,” was added to the study’s coverage in 2011; one in every nine high school seniors (11.4%) reported using that drug in the prior 12 months.


Other Key Survey Results

  • Energy drinks are being consumed by about one-third of teens, with use highest among younger teens.
  • Drugs showing some evidence of declines in use this year include: inhalants, cocaine, Vicodin, Adderall (i.e. the misuse of this commonly prescribed ADHD medication), sedatives, tranquilizers, and over-the-counter cough and cold medicines.

For more information on the 2011 Survey, access the MTF website at http://monitoringthefuture.org/

Technology Evaluations for Students with Learning Disabilities

January 9th, 2012

Many students are returning to school from the holiday break with new technology in their backpacks. For those with learning disabilities, technology is an important tool in leveling the playing field, providing struggling students with the ability to access educational material that may otherwise prove challenging to understand.

As Assistive Technology (AT) continues to evolve, the task of evaluating what makes sense for your child becomes more complex. Thankfully there are professionals that can help.

It all begins with an AT evaluation, which should be conducted by a professional or team of professionals, often including an independent evaluator, who are knowledgeable about the specific needs of the child.

The evaluator should have experience and training in AT devices, services, and implementation, and be able to integrate the technologies into the curriculum through the IEP or 504 plan.

A thorough evaluation may include the following components:

  • Review of evaluation results and IEP goals and objectives
  • Discussion with parents and those who work with the child
  • Interaction between the child and the technology
  • Trial in a variety of settings in which the device is likely to be used
  • Consideration of the child’s and the family’s feelings about the devices
  • Observation of the child using a full range of devices, moving along the continuum from no technology to low-tech to high-tech
  • Analysis from trials regarding the child’s ability and accuracy when using various technologies, including positioning and settings that work best

Book Review: The Good School: How Parents Get Their Kids the Education They Deserve

January 2nd, 2012

Reviewed by Mark J. Griffin, Ph.D.

Peg Tyre’s new book, The Good School: How Parents Get Their Kids the Education They Deserve is a must read for all parents who want the best possible education for their children. The book is especially helpful to parents of children with learning disabilities and ADHD as it’s filled with information and advice on how to navigate the school system to ensure that children with special needs receive the services necessary to maximize their education.

Tyre takes a no-nonsense, practical approach to showing parents how to assess the effectiveness of their child’s school and to bring about change, when necessary. Her roadmap includes asking the right questions, getting actively involved, and fostering respectful relationships with school personnel—elements important for influencing change.

Her advice reflects a harsh reality of education today as parents find themselves in the unenviable position of knowing little about education, yet being pressed to make critical decisions and judgments about their children’s schooling.

The Good School helps parents to “look under the hood” and get up to speed on the most important issues that are likely to impact their child’s educational experience.

Tyre escorts the reader through the mainstays of education—reading and math—confirming that we do indeed know how to teach these subjects effectively, yet often do not. She shows that good evidence-based practice in all content disciplines exists, is readily available, yet does not get used in the classroom as often as it should.


Step-By-Step Guidance

Perhaps most important, Tyre does not simply describe the issues, shortcomings, and frustrations that abound in education today. She rolls up her sleeves and shows readers what they can do to choose schools wisely, and help to improve them by becoming a well-informed partner in the educational process.

Throughout the book, Tyre makes a strong case for balance—balancing the way we assess students’ progress, and creating balance in the curriculum. She argues that recess is as important as other subjects in the development of the whole child. And in this era of high-stakes testing, she warns against teaching to the test, suggesting that doing so is robbing us of opportunities to really educate children.

At the end of each chapter Tyre provides succinct, critical “Take Aways” which will help parents grasp the critical features of the content. Readers will find themselves referring to these themes as they embrace their important role as active participants in their child’s school and education.


The Key Ingredient

When all is said and done, Tyre points a knowing finger at the most critical component of a child’s successful educational experience. After plying the reader with statistics, content area exploration, the testing phenomenon, class size, politics, funding, school culture, and a myriad of other defining features of our education system, she focuses squarely on the most important mediating variable – the effective teacher.

Good teachers it seems matter more than almost anything else in a child’s education. Tyre suggests that the best schools have created a school-wide process to develop and retain excellent teachers. They provide deliberate, focused mentoring programs and multilevel teacher evaluations that include evaluation of test scores, class observation, and parent and student surveys. All those variables are used to inform and improve teacher and school practices.

Tyre leaves us with food for thought as she describes what the “perfect school” might look like and then nudges us back to reality by telling the reader there really is no such thing. She does suggest, however, that parents in a true partnership with schools may be able to come pretty close.


Mark J. Griffin, Ph.D. is an educational consultant and founding headmaster of Eagle Hill School in Greenwich, CT for children with learning disabilities. He is on the board of directors for the National Center for Learning Disabilities and the Learning Disabilities Association of America, and is a member of Smart Kids’ Professional Advisory Board.

Support for Special Ed in New Federal Budget

January 2nd, 2012

Once again, at the eleventh hour—days before the government was due to shut down for lack of funds—partisans came together to pass a compromise budget that will support important education initiatives through September 2012. Included in the measure is a slight increase for Title 1 grants for disadvantaged children and special education.

Under the bill, special education will enjoy an increase of $100 million for a total of $11.6 billion. The increase represents a small percentage of the total amount, which is unlikely to have an impact once it’s divvied up among tens of thousands of school districts. Still, advocates can take heart that funding did not decrease as it has in so many other areas of the federal budget.

In addition, there’s more to cheer about for those concerned with literacy, an area of importance for learning disabilities advocates. The bill provides $160 million in new money to develop a comprehensive literacy program.

Other important education priorities that will now continue through most of next year are President Obama’s signature Race to the Top initiative (albeit with a $700 million cut in funding), along with Investing in Innovation, and the School Improvement Grants to turn around low-performing schools.